BOP Interview: Robert Zemeckis
By Ryan Mazie
November 1, 2012
BoxOfficeProphets.com

I hope we don't crash on that weird island.

“Francois Truffaut has one of my favorite quotes,” said director Robert Zemeckis during a roundtable interview, “Someone asked him what makes a good movie and he said, ‘A good movie is the perfect blend of truth and spectacle.’” Zemeckis’s latest film Flight is evidence of his subscription to that belief. Dark, harrowing, and raw are not words that typically come to mind when thinking of ways to describe films by the director of such classics as Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Back to the Future, Forrest Gump, and Cast Away, but Zemeckis changes things up for his return to live-action filmmaking after spending the last decade working with motion-capture (The Polar Express, Beowulf, A Christmas Carol).

The spectacle of Flight happens almost immediately, with a chillingly jaw-dropping plane crash sequence that sets the film’s weighty tone, which deals with the truths of relationships and addiction as coping mechanisms. However, the spectacle continues throughout the film with phenomenal performances by the cast members. Denzel Washington plays troubled pilot Whip Whitaker, who adverts disaster by dangerously inverting a crashing commercial airliner to ease the blow of impact and save the souls on board. Hailed as a daring hero by the media, an investigation finds that Whip was high on cocaine and alcohol during the flight.

Flight chronicles Whip’s personal struggles with dramatic ambiguity. Other actors who fall under a grey area of good and evil include Don Chedale as Whip’s powerhouse attorney to fight the drug charges, Kelly Reilly as Whip’s love interest, who is a heroin-abuser in recovery, and John Goodman as Whip’s supplier.

A master class in acting, Zemeckis talks about what drew him to the piece, returning to live action, his directing technique, and Denzel’s swagger.

So I read that you are a pilot. Did that have any relevance to your attachment to the film?

RZ: It only helped in me trying to make sure that everything we did was realistic. But it didn’t inspire me to make the movie.

Then what drew you to the film?

RZ: The ambiguity of it all. Whenever I get a chance to read a screenplay that keeps me wanting to turn the page, that’s a good start. But I loved that there was so much gray within all of the characters... they didn’t fall on the obvious good or bad side of the scale. They all were broken and basically human. And yet, the piece was very dramatic and I thought that this was very unique and that’s what drew me to it.

There is a great amount of ambiguity with the characters. Have you come up with answers for yourself yet on where you stand on the issues or are you still flip-flopping? Flight has been with you for a much longer time than with us who just saw it and are still debating about it.

RZ: That’s good. I’m hoping that people keep talking about the movie. The worst thing that can happen to a movie is that everyone comes out and goes, “Where do you want to eat?” and never give it another thought. So I’m pleased that it’s sticking with you.

The film has moments where it deals with a variety of heavier subjects such as terminal illness, alcoholism, and drug abuse. How do you go about handling subjects that other directors can’t necessarily handle?

RZ: I think the secret of the trick is that I never spoke about it in terms of addiction or substance abuse. I always felt from the beginning that the substance abuse was a symptom of the real problem, which was this sort of emotional bankruptcy, soul sickness, disconnect from all of the other humans in [Whip’s] life. So he had to do something to anesthetize the pain, so he abused substances. But it wasn’t about that; it was about him. That’s why it feels universal in a sense, because it could’ve been about anything. It could have been about a gambling problem, a shopping problem, binging on cookies, whatever the issue may be. In my mind, it is just the symptom of what the real issue is.

All of the actors truly camouflage themselves into their roles. What is your preparation process like?

RZ: What I do is just this (gesturing to the roundtable). We just sit around and talk for quite a long time, like over a week. Some actors have notebooks, some just listen; even if they are in only a couple of scenes, they all want to be there so they get a sense of the movie that I’m making. This is the process and I always have the writer with me and we hash it out. I call it rehearsal (laughs).

When you are filming, do you have a specific vision of how you want the scene to go or do you let the actors have the freedom to embody the character’s movements for themselves?

RZ: I always come to the set with a pretty well worked out plan, but I’m flexible. Sometimes an actor will say that he prefers to be sitting than standing and I’m cool with that unless it’s like you need to be sitting to get your hand on the gun, because it is a plot point (laughs). But if it doesn’t matter to me and they’re more comfortable one way, then I’d shoot it to help them out. And a lot of times, the cameraman will say, “If we stage a scene over here we can look out this window,” and I’ll say, “Oh yeah, that’s cool.” So I’m pretty flexible.

This is your return to live action filmmaking after filming with motion capture technology over the past decade. It’s like a getting the chance to have a second introduction to a new generation of audiences.

RZ: Now what will happen is that there will be all this fury on the Internet. He’s forsaken performance capture! (laughs)

But speaking of the past, you’ve influenced a lot of today’s directors.

RZ: I don’t think so. I still think that I’m 16 years old. Of course, if they did steal from me, they’d be stealing from guys like David Lean and Hitchcock (laughs). It wouldn’t be my stuff anyway.

What were you most excited to shoot again? Those heavy dramatic scenes working with the actors or that adrenaline-pumping plane sequence?

RZ: You know, I am never excited to shoot anything. That’s the hardest part. That’s just surviving; getting through the day. I really wanted to realize the production of this screenplay and see if I could pull off some of these scenes that are just magnificent, that John wrote. That’s what I wanted to do.

What is very interesting about the screenplay is that the climax is almost at the beginning of the film and everything unravels from there.

RZ: It’s unique. It flies in the face of convention. You put the big action scene at the beginning, and naturally I was concerned about if a movie can survive that. But what ultimately happens is while that’s great spectacle, in my opinion, Denzel’s performance is an even greater spectacle.

The tracking shot of Denzel in the beginning while he is in full pilot uniform and sunglasses – how many takes do you need to capture that Denzel swagger?

RZ: (laughs) I think I maybe did four or five takes, only because we were ramping that shot; changing the pace, just for technical reasons. But Denzel did it great every time (laughs).